PASS
A framework for manuscript-to-journal reasoning

From a manuscript to the right journal,
with the evidence to show why.

Start analysis

PASS recommends an appropriate journal for a manuscript through three coordinated agents: a manuscript-understanding agent, a literature-retrieval agent, and a journal-fit reasoning agent.

input Manuscript
scroll to follow the workflow
00 Input · Manuscript
00 · Input

One manuscript, many possible homes.

Choosing where to submit is a high-stakes decision made under uncertainty. PASS starts from the manuscript itself — and builds the reasoning in stages you can inspect, audit, and contest.

01 · Agent one

Manuscript-understanding agent.

Taking a paper as input, the manuscript-understanding agent analyzes the title, abstract, and main sections to construct a compact summary of the paper's storyline, contribution, and limitations, producing manuscript-derived signals.

  • Storyline
  • Contribution
  • Limitations
  • Claims
  • Evidence
02 · Agent two

Literature-retrieval agent.

The literature-retrieval agent converts the manuscript profile into targeted queries and uses retrieved related papers to assess overlap, novelty and positioning relative to prior work, while review and benchmark papers provide broader field trends.

  • PubMed
  • Europe PMC
  • Semantic Scholar
03 · Agent three

Journal-fit reasoning agent.

The journal-fit reasoning agent integrates task-specific instructions, manuscript metadata and literature evidence to jointly generate a ranked list of candidate journals with rationales and manuscript-level assessments of novelty, impact, soundness and writing quality.

  • Novelty
  • Impact
  • Soundness
  • Writing
04 · Output

A ranked list — with reasons.

The final output provides best-fit journals, evidence-grounded rationales and feedback for strengthening the manuscript before submission.

Evaluation dimensions

Four scores, one holistic assessment.

PASS evaluates each manuscript across four complementary dimensions, making the result interpretable.

Impact potential

The likely influence of the work, breadth of audience, citation potential, and relevance to the field.

Novelty

How original is the contribution relative to existing methods and findings in the retrieved literature?

Conceptual soundness

Evaluates study design, statistical rigor and whether limitations are clearly addressed.

Writing quality

Clarity of the manuscript structure, presentation and reproducibility of the methods.

Try PASS

Upload a manuscript.
Improve your paper. Find the right home.

Each recommendation is paired with its evidence trail, so you can know the rationale behind each suggestion.